Housing Policy Analysis

Bay Area Housing Policy Benchmarker

Compare inclusionary housing requirements, density limits, parking rules, and approval timelines across 15 Bay Area cities. Instantly benchmark your jurisdiction against peer communities.

Last updated: March 30, 2026

Select Cities to Compare (2-4)

PolicyCampbellSunnyvaleCupertinoMountain ViewLos GatosSaratoga
Inclusionary Housing
RequiredYesYesYesYesYesNo
Percentage15%20%18%16%12%
Unit Threshold10520155
In-Lieu Fee (per unit)$125,000$150,000$160,000$140,000$170,000
Maximum Density
Residential (du/ac)504540483530
Mixed Use (du/ac)656055655040
ADU Policy
Max Size (sq ft)120010001000110012001200
Detached AllowedYesYesNoYesYesYes
JADU AllowedYesYesYesYesYesNo
Parking Required (spaces)1111
Fee WaiverNoYesNoYesNoNo
Development Impact Fees (per unit)
Total$45,000$52,000$58,000$48,000$62,000$55,000
Parks$12,000$14,000$16,000$13,000$18,000$16,000
Traffic$18,000$20,000$22,000$19,000$24,000$20,000
Schools$8,000$12,000$15,000$10,000$15,000$12,000
Parking Requirements (spaces/unit)
Studio10.7510.511.5
1BR1.51.251.511.52
2BR21.7521.522.5
Approval Timeline
Avg Days to Entitlement180165210175220240

Policy Summary

Among the selected 6 cities: Campbell requires 15% inclusionary housing, which is below the median of 16.2%. Maximum residential density of 50 du/acre is above the peer average of 41.3 du/acre. Total development impact fees of $45,000/unit place it in the middle among compared cities.

About This Tool

Data & Methodology

Data Source: Policy data is curated from individual city municipal codes, zoning ordinances, fee schedules, and published planning documents. Each data point includes its source citation and date last verified.

15 Bay Area Cities: Campbell, Sunnyvale, Cupertino, Mountain View, Los Gatos, Saratoga, Santa Clara, San Jose, Milpitas, Palo Alto, Redwood City, Fremont, Sausalito, Mill Valley, and Emeryville.

6 Policy Categories: Inclusionary Housing, Maximum Density, ADU Policy, Development Impact Fees, Parking Requirements, and Approval Timeline.

How to Use This Tool

Compare Tab: Select 2–4 cities from the list. The comparison table shows how each city's policies differ. Color coding highlights outliers (amber = more restrictive, green = more permissive than peer average).

City Profile Tab: View all policy details for a single city in a clean, printable layout with source citations and verification dates.

Rankings Tab: Rank all 15 cities by a specific metric (e.g., inclusionary percentage, total fees, density). Compare your city against the peer average and median.

Data Quality & Disclaimer

Policy data is current as of the dates shown. Housing and zoning codes change frequently. Always verify with individual jurisdictions for the most current information before making planning or design decisions. This tool is for comparative analysis only and should not be used as a substitute for official municipal code or legal review.

Found an error? Suggest a correction →

About the Policy Categories

Inclusionary Housing

Policies requiring new residential development to include units for lower-income households or pay fees into affordable housing trust funds.

Maximum Density

Zoning limits on residential units per acre in the highest-density residential and mixed-use zones, including density bonus adoption status.

ADU Policy

Accessory Dwelling Unit rules: maximum size, whether detached units and JADUs are allowed, parking requirements, and fee waivers.

Development Impact Fees

Per-unit fees for parks, traffic, schools, affordable housing, and other public facilities required for new residential development.

Parking Requirements

Minimum spaces per unit by bedroom count, transit-oriented reductions, EV requirements, and other parking policies.

Approval Timeline

Average days to entitlement, whether ministerial approval paths or SB 35 streamlining is available to reduce entitlement times.